Friday, June 04, 2004

Is Bush the Worst President in History?

I think anyone who says yes to this question, definately has a super strong case for themselves. Anyone who says no, might have a point. As long as they say something like, "He is not the worst, there were 1-2 that were worse. This position could spark a healthy debate. A logical debate. You know what could spark a laughable, one-sided debate. If someone actually had the nerve to call him the best President ever. This will not happen, not even his right-wing religous fanatics or his no tax paying corporations could hold a straight enough face to make that claim. Americans are fed up with this President. If one thing I learned from the Bill Clinton witch hunt impeachment, it is that Americans do not like liars. That, in itself, is what poses the problems for this administration. And whether they are liars or just make extremely bad estimates, it does not matter. To the American people, it looks like a big ball of lies. Maybe it would be OK, if these lies, or extraordinarily bad estimates, had no "real effect" on America, but that's just not the case at all. They have powerful profound effects on just about everything about us, as seen through the eyes of someone outside the country.

I believe Americans are too smart to elect Bush a first time, so he will lose in November. I'm sure that the same results will come through as 2000 (only by a lot more) and Bush will once again end up in second place. Only this time without prejudice vote organizers, faulty vote counting system, and without giving the court the chance to select our president. We want a President-elect not a President-select. Extremely big difference.

1 Comments:

At 5:58 PM, Blogger John said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home